You know the smell. That specific, expensive smell of fresh lamination and ink binding together 237 slides of high-gloss corporate intention. It sits on the shelf, dense and silent, often accompanied by the subtle, oppressive heat generated by the server rack storing the backup PDF. It’s physical evidence of success, the artifact of profound alignment, and the proof that someone spent $499,997 to tell us what we already vaguely suspected.
We call it ‘Project Everest.’
The codename itself is a symptom: grand, monolithic, implying that the summit is the goal, and the descent-the actual execution, the daily slog-is merely logistics. Last Tuesday, I watched a mid-level manager, sweating slightly in the climate-controlled office, scrolling frantically through his SharePoint history looking for the slide defining ‘Disruptive Enablement’ or ‘Enabled Disruption.’
This is where we live. This is the schism. We spend fortunes creating beautiful silence. We fetishize the process of strategy creation-the three months of workshops, the offsite dinners, the endless brainstorming sessions using sticky notes in three different shades of yellow-because it feels like *work*. It feels strategic. It feels important.
The Functionally Useless Masterpiece
We pay exorbitant sums for consultants who specialize in producing an immaculate theatrical performance for the executive suite, resulting in a deck that is aesthetically brilliant and functionally useless.
It’s a perfect strategy. On paper. And that, precisely, is the problem. It was engineered for the paper, for the C-suite review, not for the messy, contradictory reality of the humans who have to implement it… The deck is a finished object, handed down from on high, treating strategy like the Ten Commandments carved in stone, rather than a living, breathing, dirty process.
REVELATION: The Alibi Machine
When the implementation success rate hovers around a depressing 7%, you have to ask yourself: did we buy a strategy, or did we buy a highly polished alibi?
The Operator’s Metric vs. The Consultant’s Metric
“I used to genuinely believe that if the language was precise enough… I confused clarity of presentation with clarity of action. They are fundamentally different things.”
– Reflection on Strategy Adoption
Finley V., a meme anthropologist, suggested that the $500k deck is not a planning document, but a massive, expensive corporate meme-a visual language of seriousness meant to be seen and approved, not used.
Implementation Success Rate
Success Rate (Typical)
Success Rate (Real World)
The Lowest Common Denominator
True alignment doesn’t start with a high-level pillar; it starts with the lowest common denominator of daily work, and builds up. You cannot implement ‘Global Synergy’ if your teams spend 7 hours a week just trying to share files across continents due to fragmented, unsupported IT infrastructure.
The real Pillar 1.
The focus must be on integrating strategy into the go-to-market model from day one, treating the first tactical movement as part of the strategy itself. This commitment to execution over artifact is why firms that actually live in the implementation trench are required. They bypass the Everest presentation entirely and start by digging the foundation. For an example of this philosophy in action, consider the approach taken by firms like the Minimalist Agency, who prioritize foundation work.
The Messy Reality of Customer Journeys
The anticipation of transformation is always highest right after the deck is printed. Then the delay hits: six weeks of ‘internal alignment’ meetings to figure out who gets stuck with the grunt work. Major strategic shifts require hundreds of micro-transformations at the operational level, compromises the $499,997 deck specifically avoided detailing.
§
When we rolled it out, our customer service team immediately broke the geometrically perfect funnel. Not out of malice, but necessity. They effectively rewrote the strategy on the fly, proving that the smartest strategy always emerges from the point of friction, not the boardroom.
We need to stop asking, ‘Is the strategy approved?’ and start asking, ‘Is the strategy affecting behavior right now?’ If the answer requires someone to search SharePoint for more than 7 seconds, the strategy is inert.
The Essential Ingredient: Struggle
The real failure isn’t the cost; it’s the missed opportunity to institutionalize the ability to execute. When we pay for an external artifact, we implicitly outsource our organizational thinking.
The Forging Process
We need to acknowledge that the process of struggle-the messy, internal fight over resources and priorities-is the essential ingredient. You cannot outsource the struggle, because the struggle *is* the strategy being forged. If it was easy to put together, it will be impossible to implement.
Organizational Execution Muscle
73%
So, before you greenlight the next colossal consulting engagement, remember the weight of the paper, the heat of the server, and the silence of the beautiful, laminated lies. Stop investing in the performance. Start investing in the muscle memory.
The Cost of Being Perfect
The perfect plan is always the enemy of necessary action. The question isn’t whether your deck is aligned with the five pillars, but what small, contradictory thing your best people are doing right now to actually keep the lights on.
